Double Down Option

The tricky thing about this play is that the rules related to doubling down may vary wildly in different casinos, which is why you should be well-acquainted with the doubling rule variations you may encounter. These are not written on the table’s felt, so you will either have to ask the dealer for specifics or stand by and observe others play for a while.

In many multiple-deck games, players are permitted to double on any starting two-card total without further restrictions. This is the most player-friendly rule variation because it gives you the opportunity to potentially turn a profit in all advantageous situations you face.

This is not the case in some casinos, where players are restricted to doubling only on specific two-card totals, particularly hard 9, 10, and 11, which increases the house edge by 0.09%. Some venues even restrict doubling to totals of 10 and 11 only, which gives the house edge a boost of around 0.18%.

We previously explained that the player is normally required to increase their bet up to the amount of their original stake. In some casinos, however, there are blackjack tables where the so-called “free double down” rule applies. This variation of the game is known as Free Bet Blackjack and was invented by Geoff Hall, the same guy who came up with Blackjack Switch.

Free Bet Blackjack debuted in the summer of 2012 at the Golden Nugget Casino in downtown Las Vegas and immediately attracted crowds of eager blackjack players because it gave them the opportunity to double down on the house, i.e., without the need to post additional wagers.

Instead, the dealer places a lammer next to your original wager to mark your double down. If you win, the dealer will pay you for both your initial bet and your double. Should you lose, you lose only your original bet.

You probably think this sounds too good to be true, and indeed, you are right. The main catch here is that players are restricted to doubling at no cost only on totals of 9, 10, and 11. When the dealer draws to a total of 22, they do not bust like they normally would. Instead, they push with you if your total is 21 or lower. Add the H17 rule and the absence of surrender to the mix, and the house edge for this game jumps to 1.04% with basic strategy.

At some blackjack tables, players are given the option to double on three cards or more, which is great because it translates into even more opportunities to turn extra profits. Suppose, for example, you start your hand with two cards that add up to 7 against a dealer’s 5 and then you draw a 4 for a total of eleven.

It would be impossible to double down at this stage in a regular game of 21. However, if you are playing a blackjack variation that allows for doubling on three or more cards, you will be able to fully exploit your dealer’s weakness by doubling on your three-card 11 and potentially pocketing an extra payout.

This rule variation is an absolute rarity, of course, but do not hesitate to take advantage of it if you do happen to come across one such table. This rule takes away around 0.20% of the casino’s edge.

In some gambling establishments, blackjack players are permitted to double down for less than their initial bet. For example, if you wager $20 on a hand suitable for doubling down, you can double for an amount smaller than $20, like $15 or $10. It is typical for some conservative or underbanked players to take advantage of this rule variation.

Should you do it, though? No, doubling down for less is not a good idea. This decision is contrary to what doubling is all about. Players can maximize their profits only by reaching deeper into their pockets and increasing their double down bets to the full permissible amount at the table.

Let’s consider the following situation to better demonstrate how unwise doubling for less than your original bet really is. Suppose you post a $10 bet and are dealt a strong starting total of 11 against the dealer’s Queen, which, as you know, is assigned a value of 10 like all other face cards. You have several options here, excluding standing since not drawing more cards on your 11 is contrary to all logic.

You can hit your hand, double down for the full amount of your bet, or double down for less. Hitting a starting total of 11 against the dealer’s 10 results in a win around 56% of the time. Therefore, your average expectations with a total of 11 are to win roughly 56 out of every 100 hands, ties excluded. With a $10 bet, this accounts for overall profits of $560, overall losses of $440, and net profits of $120 over the course of a hundred hands.

We have explained on several occasions that a blackjack dealer ends up winning slightly more often than the player. The player’s probability of winning a hand in a fair game is around 44% whereas the dealer’s probability is roughly 47%. The remaining 9% account for the occasions when the dealer and the player push.

From this perspective, it makes sense for the player to bet more conservatively on the majority of the hands they play through. However, this is not the case when it comes to doubling down on hard totals, where you should play more aggressively, increasing your action if the dealer has a relatively high likelihood of exceeding 21 and you have an edge over their hand.

Some people would settle for their soft totals and dismiss both hitting and doubling on such hands because they are too afraid they may end up getting stuck with a lower total by drawing an additional card. This fear causes them to pass on many lucrative opportunities to increase their action when holding an advantage against the dealer.

Some players mistakenly assume the reason why basic strategy recommends doubling on certain soft totals is that you try to outdraw the dealer. Yet, if you take a quick look at the basic-strategy chart, you will see doubling is a viable option with soft totals only when the dealer is exposing a weak card.

In other words, you double on hands like A-4 and A-5 against the dealer’s 4, 5, or 6 because they are more likely to bust with these small cards, and you want to get as much money into action as you can against a vulnerable dealer.

Doubling down can be very profitable, but it can also be very tricky for the simple reason you are entitled to draw only one extra card. When doubling on soft hands, you may get stuck with a lower total than the one you started with.

Similarly, if you double down on a hand like 7-2 against the dealer’s 5, and you draw a 2 or a 3, you will be left with poor totals like 11 or 12. The only way for you to win the round would be for the dealer to break their hand. You would have been able to hit your hand repeatedly if you had not doubled. And yet, doubling is the correct play in one such scenario. Continue reading to see why.

We talked about how sometimes doubling down can get you into trouble, but it remains the best play nevertheless. This is the case when you are dealt a hard 9 against a vulnerable dealer who exposes a small card such as a 5. In one such scenario, you will win roughly 59% of the time and lose around 41% of the hands, that is, if we do not include the pushes.

Thus, if you flat bet $10 and play the same hand a hundred times, you can expect to win $590 and lose $410 for an overall net profit of $180. The average profit you generate per hand with this play is $180/100 = $1.80.

Your win rate for the hand drops down to around 57% when you double down, but this difference is offset by the fact that you are winning twice as much when executing this play. Your average net profit per hand in this instance is equal to ($570 – $430) * 2 = $280/100 = $2.80. As you can see, you win $1.00 more per hand, which is why doubling on your hard 9 against the dealer’s small card is the best course of action.

We already discussed the subject of doubling on an 11 against a dealer’s 10 and the profound effect it has in terms of net winnings. Now, let’s consider an example where you double on a 10 against a dealer with a small card, 4 for example.

Regardless of the composition of your hard 10 (8-2, 6-4, 5-5, 7-3), the mathematical probability of you winning with this move is roughly 58%, while that of you losing is around 35%, with the remaining 7% accounting for the ties where no money switches hands (respectively there are no net profits). Let’s suppose you have wagered $10 on this hand and are playing a multiple-deck game where the S17 rule applies.

If you decide to merely hit your hard 10 and draw a small card 2 through 7, you are not supposed to draw again anyway because the basic strategy for the game you are playing recommends that you stand on hard totals 12 through 17 when the dealer exposes a 4.

Inexperienced players often struggle with soft totals, especially when doubling down is concerned. They are too scared they might ruin their soft hand by drawing a card that reduces its total and turns it into a stiff. They argue this is way too risky and may cost them twice as much money if the double down is unsuccessful.

However, in certain situations when the dealer is at a disadvantage, basic strategy requires you to double down on your soft hands, particularly when the dealer is weak with small cards 3 through 6. Here is a brief breakdown of the doubling rules for soft hands 13 through 18 for a multiple-deck game where the dealer stands on soft 17. If doubling is not allowed on any two cards, proceed by hitting or standing depending on your total and the dealer’s upcard.

• Double on soft 13 and soft 14 against a dealer 5 or 6, otherwise hit
• Double on soft 15 and soft 16 against a dealer 4, 5, or 6, otherwise hit
• Double on soft 17 against a dealer 3, 4, 5, or 6, otherwise hit
• Double on soft 18 against a dealer 3, 4, 5, or 6, otherwise stand

Let’s now examine an example with a soft 17 against a dealer’s 4 to see the exact differences in the net profits when you hit and double. Whether you hit or stand has no impact on the outcome of the hand itself because there is no card you can possibly draw that will cause you to make another hit. In the worst possible scenario, you will end up drawing a 5 for a hard total of 12 and stand against the dealer’s 4 in accordance with basic strategy.